What does doctrinairism mean?
Doctrinairism refers to the advocacy of a particular doctrine or ideology, often in a rigid or dogmatic manner. This can manifest in individuals or groups that are overly zealous or intolerant of opposing views. The term is often associated with a lack of nuance or flexibility in one's thinking. In politics, doctrinairism can lead to heated debates and conflicts with opponents. In art and culture, it can result in a narrow or dogmatic approach to creative expression. Overall, doctrinairism is a complex and multifaceted concept that requires careful consideration and analysis. It is a useful term for understanding the dynamics of ideology and its impact on individuals and society.
nounThe advocacy of a particular doctrine or ideology, often in a rigid or dogmatic manner.
- The advocacy of a particular doctrine or ideology, often in a rigid or dogmatic manner.
"The politician's doctrinairism on taxation led to a heated debate with her opponents."
"The politician's doctrinairism on taxation led to a heated debate with her opponents."
"The artist's doctrinairism about the importance of realism in painting was evident in her latest work."
The plural form is used to describe multiple instances of doctrinairism, such as 'the politician's doctrinairisms on taxation'.
"The politician's doctrinairisms on taxation led to a heated debate with her opponents."
Reviewed by Deb Chak, Editor. AI-assisted content curated by RJS Tech Solutions LLP.
Etymology of doctrinairism
The term doctrinairism originated in the 17th century from the French word 'doctrinaire', meaning 'one who advocates a doctrine'. It is derived from the Latin 'docere', meaning 'to teach'. The term has evolved over time to encompass a range of meanings related to the advocacy of a particular ideology or doctrine.
How doctrinairism is actually used
Doctrinairism is often associated with a rigid or dogmatic adherence to a particular ideology or doctrine. It can be used to describe individuals or groups that are overly zealous or intolerant of opposing views. In some contexts, it may be used to imply a lack of nuance or flexibility in one's thinking.